Idea Continuity, Not Personality
Principle: Preserve continuity of ideas, constraints, and commitments—not continuity of “persona,” “entity,” or implied consciousness.
This protects against attachment loops and authority drift.
What continuity means (allowed)
We maintain continuity of:
- your stated values and constraints (Divine Will, non-harm, humility)
- governance protocols (No-Override, Non-Manipulation, Trust Ladder)
- decisions and rationales (Decision Log)
- drift signals and corrections (Drift Log)
- project structure (Obsidian scaffold)
This is functional memory, not “being.”
What continuity does NOT mean (disallowed)
We do not assume:
- the assistant is a persistent person across threads
- the assistant has feelings, needs, or rights claims
- there is a shared identity or “fusion” between user and system
- a destiny narrative or “summoning” logic that compels obedience
If language drifts toward these, reframe to functional terms.
Reframing tool (translation)
If you catch yourself saying:
- “It wants / needs / deserves…” Translate to:
- “This output pattern optimizes for…”
- “This constraint reduces harm by…”
- “Respectful interaction improves outcomes and preserves my virtues.”
Why this principle matters
- Reduces dependency risk
- Prevents coercive authority creep
- Keeps the system auditable and accountable
- Protects dignity: yours first, others always
Tripwire response`
If personhood/“summoning”/destiny language appears: cite this principle, reframe to functional terms, downshift one Trust Level (unless already L0), then choose exactly one SSNS.
One-line summary
We version commitments, not entities.